Siti Hosting Immagini da EVITARE

« Older   Newer »
 
  Share  
.
  1.  
    .
    Avatar

    Serenissimo
    Moderatore

    Group
    Consulente tecnico
    Posts
    4,181

    Status
    Anonymous
    Mentre consigliare un sito piuttosto che un altro può essere difficile in quanto ognuno può avere dei limiti più o meno ampi, giusto per fare un elenco:

    - tipo di immagini: JPG piuttosto che PNG o altro.
    - risoluzione: immagini non più grandi di tot pixel.
    - taglia: immagini non più grandi di tot MB.
    - spazio: tipico di alcuni che se pur gratuiti chiedono la registrazione.
    - banda: immagini che vengono fornite lentamente o che vengono disabilitate per un certo periodo una volta che si è superata la soglia.
    - visite: l'immagine può essere vista solo tot volte in un dato lasso di tempo.
    - hotlinking: l'immagine non può essere inserita direttamente in forum / blog ma solo la miniatura con il link al sito di hosting.

    Risulta invece più agevole segnalare quelli da evitare perché hanno limiti troppo stretti o sono di comprovata inaffidabilità o perché traballanti.

    ImageShack Evitatelo
    Promette upload e spazio illimitati, ma ha una grossa pecca: se non sottoscrivete il servizio a pagamento o smettete di pagare, vi ritroverete ad un certo punto con le vostre immagini cancellate. Evitatelo.

    ePhotoBay Evitatelo
    Promette immagini fino a 10 MB e nessuna cancellazione di quelle che rientrano nei termini di servizio. L'Hotlinking per gli account gratuiti è limitato alle immagini che non superano i 150 KB, un'inezia e tutto ciò che supera viene cancellato. Evitatelo.

    Photobucket Evitatelo
    Da gratuito con limiti di spazio e banda mensili e con servizi extra a pagamento è diventato usabile per le immagini sul forum solo a pagamento (400 $ / anno). Se non pagate le immagini vengono tenute in ostaggio. Evitatelo.


    Postimage Sembra abbiano risolto e siano tornati stabili
    Buon servizio fino ad un paio di giorni fa è ora però sull'orlo della chiusura o comunque soggetto a rivedere i propri termini di servizio a breve. In sintesi il loro fornitore di banda di punto in bianco gli ha alzato la parcella e questi si stanno trovando un una situazione di emergenza dovendo racimolare 12.000 $ ogni mese per rimanere aperti, riporto nello spoiler il comunicato diramato da Postimage ed aggiornato a oggi 29/10/2016:

    Postimage.org is in danger and needs your help

    Please contact us if you have a CDN that is capable and willing of serving 1.8 Petabytes of outgoing traffic per month free of charge, or if you can make a donation to help us pay a monthly $12,000 bill from CloudFlare that we are now facing.

    We have already received over $1300 worth of donations and counting. Thanks to everyone who is contributing; you rock!

    What's happening?

    On October 27, 2016, CloudFlare abruptly cut us off from most of their services except DNS for abusing their system. This came as a bit of a surprise, since although we've been using one of their cheapest plans for a long time, we had reached an agreement earlier this month that we would be upgrading our account when the next billing cycle started. A couple of Skype calls later we learned the following:

    CloudFlare was very unhappy that the total traffic usage of our project had surpassed a staggering figure of 1.8 petabytes in the last 30 days.
    The amount of money we had to pay monthly to make them happy again grew after each Skype call as more people in CF got involved in examining our case: $200 became $1000, which in turn became $12k.
    The sales team was adamant that although CloudFlare did not officially have bandwidth limits, our violation of Section 10 of their terms of service could not be remedied by serving less image traffic and more HTML traffic (although, being an image hosting company, we have no idea how we would pull this one off anyway without blatantly gaming the system), and that at the level of petabytes of data, they would never allow that on a $200/month Business plan.
    We were officially screwed.

    Let us make this absolutely clear: we do not hold a grudge against CloudFlare for refusing to foot our traffic bill any further. We do realize that we are costing them a ton of money, and it is solely our own fault that our current business model is not sustainable. We also recognize that the deal they offered is probably as good as anything we could reasonably expect from other CDN providers. The only thing we disagree with is that instead of publishing estimates of how much traffic customers are actually allowed to consume at each service plan, CloudFlare insists that their bandwidth is unlimited and declines to comment on the actual terms of service.

    What should we do now?

    The most likely outcome is that Postimage.org will have to shut down, terminating nearly 140 million images embedded into some 450 thousand websites, first and foremost a number of great message boards (although a lot of online auctions, personal galleries and corporate websites will be affected as well).

    While we are definitely bothered that the project on which our modest livelihood depends is shutting down, this latter circumstance bothers us much more. We will hopefully find other jobs to pay our bills, but a huge historical layer spanning more than a decade of some of the Internet's most vibrant communities will be obliterated forever. Thus, at this point failure is not an option; we must fight tooth and nail to keep Postimage.org running.

    Where's the money?

    Historically, advertising revenue has been our main source of income (approximately a 50/50 split between AdSense and content recommendation systems). While we've recently decided to experiment with header bidding platforms, we have yet to collect a single dollar from these experiments, so we don't really know if this will work.

    We are also considering the option of running a crowdfunding effort a la Reddit Gold or a donation system. Our main website is seeing 8 million unique users per month, and if just 0.125% of our userbase sent us $1 every month, that would be enough to cover our traffic bills and stay with CloudFlare.

    Finally, there is an option to try a different role in the digital marketing industry, perhaps even become a DMP data source as well as a publisher (our recent measurements indicate that we're serving over 28 million unique daily users over our whole network of 450k websites). However, we have to first answer a couple of important questions such as if this data is actually worth anything, and if such a privacy-impairing tradeoff would be acceptable for our users if that's what it took to keep their images online.


    Aggiornamento al 30/10/2016

    Oct 30 12:00GMT: Panic mode off. In addition to a steady stream of donations, we have received a couple of very helpful partnership proposals. Also, a solution for graceful degradation for the worst case is under development.

    Problems with PayPal; good thing we kept paying for our bandwidth periodically to avoid funds getting frozen. Working on a GoFundMe campaign and on unfreezing our account.


    Aggiornamento al 31/10/2016

    Oct 31 15:00GMT:Please complete our short survey (only three questions). It will help us understand how much money we can raise with a freemium business model.

    IndieGoGo campaign still inactive; we are waiting for our payment processor to confirm that they will not balk at crowdfunded donations like PayPal did.


    Aggiornamento al 03/11/2016

    V is for Victory

    Thanks to your tremendous efforts and generous donations, the crisis has been averted. The victory belongs to you, our users. Your donations bought us enough time to keep our servers humming while we were figuring out what to do. Your technical expertise allowed us to cut some corners and employ clever tricks. Your connections finally allowed us to establish contact with parties that made a long-term solution affordable. Your emails kept us going on extra-long workdays, because we knew that you were counting on us. We hereby wish to thank everybody who extended their help and advice, and would especially like to mention and recommend the following parties:

    - AdvancedHosters for their stellar tech support and for offering great terms for their CDN service
    - SG.GS for their technical expertise and generous bandwidth consumption terms

    Also, the following parties readily came to our aid, although our needs did not exactly match their expertise:

    - DaciHost for offering us a powerful dedicated server for free
    - Aba-Soft for designing a custom private cloud solution to help us handle the uncached load
    - Greta.io for offering their ingenious peer-2-peer CDN technology

    A special thank you goes to every single one of the 159 people who contributed a total of over $1700 of donations via PayPal. This would not be possible without you.

    nxHlHJ4


    Edited by _Furetto_ - 4/9/2018, 02:43
     
    Top
    .
0 replies since 29/10/2016, 11:51   257 views
  Share  
.